Milk and
the Cancer Connection
by Hans R. Larsen, MSc ChE
| On January
23, 1998 researchers at the Harvard Medical School released a
major study providing conclusive evidence that IGF-1 is a potent
risk factor for prostate cancer. Should you be concerned? Yes,
you certainly should, particularly if you drink milk produced in
the United States.
IGF-1 or insulin-like growth factor 1 is an important hormone
that is produced in the liver and body tissues. It is a
polypeptide and consists of 70 amino acids linked together. All
mammals produce IGF-1 molecules very similar in structure and
human and bovine IGF-1 are completely identical. IGF-1 acquired
its name because it has insulin-like activity in fat (adipose)
tissue and has a structure that is very similar to that of
proinsulin. The body's production of IGF-1 is regulated by the
human growth hormone and peaks at puberty. IGF-1 production
declines with age and is only about half the adult value at the
age of 70 years. IGF-1 is a very powerful hormone that has
profound effects even though its concentration in the blood
serum is only about 200 ng/mL or 0.2 millionth of a gram per
milliliter (1-4).
IGF-1 and cancer
IGF-1 is known to stimulate the growth of both normal and
cancerous cells(2,5). In 1990 researchers at Stanford
University reported that IGF-1 promotes the growth of prostate
cells(2). This was followed by the discovery that IGF-1
accelerates the growth of breast cancer cells(6-8). In 1995
researchers at the National Institutes of Health reported that
IGF-1 plays a central role in the progression of many childhood
cancers and in the growth of tumours in breast cancer, small
cell lung cancer, melanoma, and cancers of the pancreas and
prostate(9). In September 1997 an international team of
researchers reported the first epidemiological evidence that
high IGF-1 concentrations are closely linked to an increased
risk of prostate cancer(10). Other researchers provided
evidence of IGF-1's link to breast and colon cancers(10,11).
The January 1998 report by the Harvard researchers confirmed
the link between IGF-1 levels in the blood and the risk of
prostate cancer. The effects of IGF-1 concentrations on
prostate cancer risk were found to be astoundingly large - much
higher than for any other known risk factor. Men having an
IGF-1 level between approximately 300 and 500 ng/mL were found
to have more than four times the risk of developing prostate
cancer than did men with a level between 100 and 185 ng/mL. The
detrimental effect of high IGF-1 levels was particularly
pronounced in men over 60 years of age. In this age group men
with the highest levels of IGF-1 were eight times more likely
to develop prostate cancer than men with low levels. The
elevated IGF-1 levels were found to be present several years
before an actual diagnosis of prostate cancer was made(12).
The evidence of a strong link between cancer risk and a high
level of IGF-1 is now indisputable. The question is why do some
people have high levels while others do not? Is it all
genetically ordained or could it be that diet or some other
outside factor influences IGF-1 levels? Dr. Samuel Epstein of
the University of Illinois is one scientist who strongly
believes so. His 1996 article in the International Journal
of Health Sciences clearly warned of the danger of high
levels of IGF-1 contained in milk from cows injected with
synthetic bovine growth hormone (rBGH). He postulated that
IGF-1 in rBGH-milk could be a potential risk factor for breast
and gastrointestinal cancers(13).
The milk connection
Bovine growth hormone was first synthesized in the early 1980s
using genetic engineering techniques (recombinant DNA
biotechnology). Small-scale industry-sponsored trials showed
that it was effective in increasing milk yields by an average
of 14 per cent if injected into cows every two weeks. In 1985
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States
approved the sale of milk from cows treated with rBGH (also
known as BST) in large-scale veterinary trials and in 1993
approved commercial sale of milk from rBGH-injected
cows(13-16). At the same time the FDA prohibited the special
labeling of the milk so as to make it impossible for the
consumer to decide whether or not to purchase it(13).
Concerns about the safety of milk from BST-treated cows were
raised as early as 1988 by scientists in both England and the
United States(14,15,17-22). One of the main concerns is the
high levels of IGF-1 found in milk from treated cows; estimates
vary from twice as high to 10 times higher than in normal cow's
milk(13,14,23). There is also concern that the IGF-1 found in
treated milk is much more potent than that found in regular
milk because it seems to be bound less firmly to its
accompanying proteins(13). Consultants paid by Monsanto, the
major manufacturer of rBGH, vigorously attacked the concerns.
In an article published in the Journal of the American
Medical Association in August 1990 the consultants claimed
that BST-milk was entirely safe for human consumption(16,24).
They pointed out that BST-milk contains no more IGF-1 than does
human breast milk - a somewhat curious argument as very few
grown-ups continue to drink mother's milk throughout their
adult life. They also claimed that IGF-1 would be completely
broken down by digestive enzymes and therefore would have no
biological activity in humans(16). Other researchers disagree
with this claim and have warned that IGF-1 may not be totally
digested and that some of it could indeed make its way into the
colon and cross the intestinal wall into the bloodstream. This
is of special concern in the case of very young infants and
people who lack digestive enzymes or suffer from
protein-related allergies(13,14,20,22,25).
Researchers at the FDA reported in 1990 that IGF-1 is not
destroyed by pasteurization and that pasteurization actually
increases its concentration in BST-milk. They also confirmed
that undigested protein could indeed cross the intestinal wall
in humans and cited tests which showed that oral ingestion of
IGF-1 produced a significant increase in the growth of a group
of male rats - a finding dismissed earlier by the Monsanto
scientists(25). The most important aspect of these experiments
is that they show that IGF-1 can indeed enter the blood stream
from the intestines - at least in rats.
Unfortunately, essentially all the scientific data used by
the FDA in the approval process was provided by the
manufacturers of rBGH and much of it has since been questioned
by independent scientists. The effect of IGF-1 in rBGH-milk on
human health has never actually been tested and in March 1991
researchers at the National Institutes of Health admitted that
it was not known whether IGF-1 in milk from treated cows could
have a local effect on the esophagus, stomach or
intestines(26,27).
Whether IGF-1 in milk is digested and broken down into its
constituent amino acids or whether it enters the intestine
intact is a crucial factor. No human studies have been done on
this, but recent research has shown that a very similar
hormone, Epidermal Growth Factor, is protected against
digestion when ingested in the presence of casein, a main
component of milk(13,23,28). Thus there is a distinct
possibility that IGF-1 in milk could also avoid digestion and
make its way into the intestine where it could promote colon
cancer(13,22). It is also conceivable that it could cross the
intestinal wall in sufficient amounts to increase the blood
level of IGF-1 significantly and thereby increase the risk of
breast and prostate cancers(13,14).
The bottom line
Despite assurances from the FDA and industry-paid consultants
there are now just too many serious questions surrounding the
use of milk from cows treated with synthetic growth hormone to
allow its continued sale. Bovine growth hormone is banned in
Australia, New Zealand and Japan. The European Union has
maintained its moratorium on the use of rBGH and milk products
from BST-treated cows are not sold in countries within the
Union. Canada has also so far resisted pressure from the United
States and the biotechnology lobby to approve the use of rBGH
commercially. In light of the serious concerns about the safety
of human consumption of milk from BST-treated cows consumers
must maintain their vigilance to ensure that European and
Canadian governments continue to resist the pressure to approve
rBGH and that the FDA in the United States moves immediately to
ban rBGH-milk or at least allow its labeling so that consumers
can protect themselves against the very real cancer risks posed
by IGF-1. |
|
Two
or More Daily Glasses of Milk May
Raise Ovarian Cancer Risks

Hormones increase milk production
| The prostate, found only in
men, is a walnut-sized gland located in front of the rectum and
underneath the urinary bladder. It contains gland cells that
produce some of the seminal fluid, which protects and nourishes
sperm cells in semen. Just behind the prostate gland are the
seminal vesicles that produce most of the fluid for semen. The
prostate surrounds the first part of the urethra, the tube that
carries urine from the bladder and semen out of the body through
the penis.
Male hormones stimulate the prostate gland to develop in the
fetus. Male hormones are also called androgens. The most common
androgen is testosterone. The prostate continues to grow as a
man reaches adulthood and is maintained after it reaches normal
size as long as male hormones are produced. If male hormone
levels are low, the prostate gland will not fully develop. In
older men, the part of the prostate around the urethra often
continues to grow, a condition called benign prostatic
hypertrophy or benign prostatic hyperplasia. This
can cause problems with urinating.
Although several cell types are found in the prostate, over
99% of prostate cancers develop from the glandular cells.
Glandular cells make the seminal fluid that is secreted by the
prostate. The medical term for a cancer that starts in
glandular cells is adenocarcinoma. Because other types
of prostate cancer are so rare, if you have prostate cancer, it
is almost certain to be an adenocarcinoma. The rest of this
document refers only to prostate adenocarcinoma.
Most prostate cancers grow slowly. Autopsy studies show that
many older men who died of other diseases also had a prostate
cancer that never affected them and that neither they nor their
doctor were aware of. Over 60% of men between ages 60 and 70
will have prostate cancer detected at autopsy. That number
climbs to 80% for men in their 70s. Some prostate cancers,
however, can grow and spread quickly.
Some doctors believe that prostate cancer begins with a
condition called prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
(PIN). PIN begins to appear in men in their 20s. Almost 50% of
men have PIN by the time they reach 50. In this condition there
are changes in the microscopic appearance (size, shape, etc.)
of prostate gland cells. These changes are classified as either
low-grade, meaning they appear almost normal or high-grade,
meaning they look abnormal.
If you have had high-grade PIN diagnosed on a prostate
biopsy, there is a 30% to 50% chance that cancer is also
present within your prostate. For this reason, men diagnosed
with high-grade PIN are watched carefully and have repeat
prostate biopsies Facts About Prostate Cancer
- An estimated 189,000 men in the U.S. are diagnosed with
prostate cancer each year.
- One man in six will be diagnosed with prostate cancer
during his lifetime, but only one man in 30 will die of this
disease.
- Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer
death in men in the U.S. (lung cancer is first).
- About 96 percent of all men diagnosed with prostate cancer
survive at least five years, and 75 percent survive at least
10 years.
- In men whose cancer has not spread beyond the prostate,
the five-year survival rate is nearly 100 percent.
- Ethnicity and environment may affect the prevalence of
prostate cancer. African American men are more likely to have
prostate cancer than Caucasian men. Asian men living in Asia
have very low rates of prostate cancer. However, when Asian
men migrate to the west, their rates increase, leaving
scientists to wonder about contributing factors such as
environment and diet.
Can Prostate Cancer Be Prevented?
Because it is not clear what causes prostate cancer, there is
no guarantee of prevention. However, experts believe that you
can reduce your risk for many types of cancer by:
- Not smoking
- Eating a low-fat, high-fiber diet
- Getting plenty of exercise
Recent nutritional studies have suggested that:
- Men who eat large amounts of green
lea
fy vegetables may develop prostate cancer less frequently.
- Men who eat tomato-based foods at least twice a week may be
at lower risk for developing prostate cancer.
Studies into diet and its relationship to prostate cancer are
inconclusive. However, a substance called lycopene, an
antioxidant found in some fruits and vegetables, is being
studied because it may offer some protection against prostate
cancer. Scientists think antioxidants
help protect protein in cells from damage. Vitamin C and
vitamin E are antioxidants.
In July
2001, the largest prostate cancer prevention trial began
enrolling participants. The trial's name is SELECT, which
stands for Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial. The
purpose is to determine whether these two dietary supplements
can protect against prostate cancer. For more information on
this trial, call the National Cancer Institute's Cancer
Information Service at 1-800-4CANCER, or visit their Web site.
www.nci.nih.gov
|
|