Home          About Us         Nutrition         Water         Research         Products     

                 Cow Feed - We are eating Cancer!

                                 
Alfalfa Leaf Powder and Chlorophyll Chlorophyllin        

   Purlife Health & Research Company          1.888.465.5037          health@purlife.com   

 

Problem:

We are eating cancer from the drugs we feed animals.  To make them grow faster or to produce more milk we feed them hormones and steroids and ground up carcasses!  We are eating the cancer we feed them!

Warrior for a Healthy Planet

by James Faber

Conscious Choice, November 1998

Beef...it's what's for dinner. It's as much a part of American culture as country music, a Chevrolet, or Grandma's apple pie. But the fact is, most Americans don't realize how meat is produced, or what goes on behind the scenes of the beef industry. Nor do they understand how most of the other food they eat is produced, or the consequences of their food choices -- especially the havoc a meat-centered diet wreaks on the health of human beings, animals, and the environment.

Howard Lyman is one man with intimate knowledge of factory farming, chemical agriculture, and their effects in the United States. He is a former insider of the American beef industry, and is considered an authority on American beef production as well as its chief antagonist.

"The American consumer is eating a product being fed with hormones, antibiotics, steroids, manure, and ground-up dead animals," Lyman says. "The difficulty is that the money is in the hands of the multi-national corporations beating the drum about eating their garbage, and it's killing this nation."

The story of Lyman's journey and transition from factory farmer to vegetarian activist, including his experience and success as a defendant with Oprah Winfrey in the now famous Texas food disparagement lawsuit, is told in his new book, Mad Cowboy: Plain Truth from the Cattle Rancher Who Won't Eat Meat, written with Glen Merzer. His story is both fascinating and unique. 

Lyman inherited his Montana dairy farm like his father and grandfather before him, but after receiving a B.S. degree in general agriculture from Montana State University, and a two year stint in the Army, he returned to the farm and abandoned the traditional organic methods. Instead, he rode the wave of chemically-based agricultural production that had swept through the United States at the end of the second world war as part of a government effort to revive a depreciating chemical industry.

"We have done what the government set out to do after World War II, which was turn agriculture into chemical junkies," says Lyman. "I saw the organic soil go from a living productive base to a sterile, chemical saturated mono-cultural ground because of my so-called modern methods."

Lyman had turned his modest 540-acre farm into a $5 million-a-year agribusiness with ten thousand acres of crops, a thousand range cows and seven thousand head of cattle in a factory feedlot. He continued his operation with little concern about the effects of the chemicals he was using on the environment, or on the consumer who ended up with meat from his feedlot on their dinner table -- until a snowy night in 1979 altered his life forever. He was diagnosed with a tumor on his spine and given a one-in-a-million chance of walking again. It was then, while lying in the hospital awaiting emergency surgery, that he decided to make a change. In Mad Cowboy, he explains, "I made up my mind right then and there that no matter what the outcome of my operation, I'd dedicate the rest of my life to restoring the land to what it had been when I'd had the good fortune to be born with it."

Ever since recovering from his operation, Lyman has stayed true to his word. He has become a voice for family farmers, animal rights, and the environment. Today, he is president of the International Vegetarian Union and keeps busy maintaining a grueling road schedule to promote an animal free diet.

Human health issues
One of the most convincing arguments for a meat-and-dairy-free diet is how directly meat and dairy products affect human health. A 1988 Surgeon General's Report on Nutrition and Health found that 68 percent of all diseases in the U.S. are diet-related.

Many scientific studies have linked human health problems to diet. In Mad Cowboy, Lyman highlights a number of different studies that point to a meat-based diet as a cause of cancer, heart disease, osteoporosis, diabetes, hypertension, and obesity in the United States.

"We have an absolute medical disaster facing this country, with an American public on a diet just loaded with saturated fat and cholesterol," he says. Instead, he advocates diets like those recommended by Dean Ornish or John McDougall, which are low in fat, high in fiber, and get most of their calories from carbohydrates rather than protein.

Studies have also shown that traces of herbicides, pesticides, and antibiotics can be found in many of the products sold to the consumer. "According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 75 percent of all carcinogens and toxins in the human body get there through animal products, and 16 percent through vegetables," says Lyman. "That means 91 percent of all carcinogens and toxins in our bodies can be eliminated by doing two things -- giving up animal products and buying organic produce."

The scientific evidence is impressive, but Lyman's own story is as effective. Among the arsenal of experiences Lyman draws from to back up his message, is the example of his own health -- he used to weigh over 300 pounds, with a cholesterol level over 300. Since becoming vegan, he has lost 130 pounds and brought his cholesterol level to 140. According to Lyman, of ten friends back home in Montana who shared the same diet he did before becoming vegan, he is the only one who hasn't had heart disease or cancer. Half of the ten have already died before reaching age 60.

"Being from Montana, I would rather be caught riding a stolen horse than admit to someone I was a vegetarian," he says. "The fact is, I knew that if I didn't change my diet, I was not going to live for very much longer."

Even despite the overwhelming evidence of the dangers of an animal based diet, a misinformed U.S. public continues to jeopardize its health with poor diet choices. In Mad Cowboy, Lyman's analogies of the meat and dairy industries to the tobacco industry illustrate how the general public is misled. "The meat and dairy industries thrive by keeping the general population too confused or misinformed to change their destructive habits," he says. "But the case for the health benefits of a vegetarian diet is at least as clear, and established in at least as many scientific studies, as the case for not smoking."

Animal issues
Most people have heard stories about what goes on in factory farms and slaughter houses, but choose to ignore the details and not think about the fact that farm animals can experience stress, frustration, fear, pain, and pleasure.

On a factory farm the animals are overcrowded in concrete feedlots, or virtually immobilized in crates or cages. The greatest number of animals are raised in the smallest possible space at the lowest possible cost to maximize productivity and profits. Factory-farmed animals are treated like machines with no concern for their pain and suffering.

According to the The Humane Society of the U.S. (HSUS), since there are no federal laws regulating the treatment of animals on farms, managers are free to use whatever methods of production are most profitable, regardless of their impact on the animals' well-being.

Lyman explains, "The percentage of food produced for the American consumer in factory farms is increasing as the number of family farms decreases. Today in Wisconsin we're seeing four small family dairy farmers go out of business every day."

In a cattle feedlot, the animals are corralled in roofless pens with a feed trough on one end, and are fed an unnatural diet, along with hormones, to achieve the main goal of the feedlot operator: make them grow as big and fat as possible, as quickly as possible. With animals in confinement, disease and health problems also become an issue for the operator. To combat this problem, feedlot operators put antibiotics in the feed of the animals, and spray insecticides directly onto them. According to Lyman, one-half of all the antibiotics in the U.S. are fed to animals -- these are the traces that eventually make it onto the consumer's plate.

The methods used for the slaughter of the animals are just as inhumane as the methods used for raising them. Cattle are stunned with a steel bolt through the head, then their throats are cut, leaving them to bleed to death. If one of the animals gets frightened, the others can sense the fear and become restless. In a written statement for the McDonald's McLibel case, Lyman states, "The animals are terrified at the slaughter plant, and the cruelty inflected on the animal in their last moments on earth [is] indescribable."

Environmental issues
Very few consumers are aware of the impact of their food choices on the environment. The current methods of agriculture in the U.S. are extremely resource-inefficient, and have serious effects on water supplies, topsoil, rainforests, and pollution.

According to statistics from the HSUS, to produce one pound of grain fed meat requires between 300 and 500 gallons of water. That means 50 percent of our water usage in the U.S. goes to livestock production, depleting our natural aquifers.

Cattle grazing also depletes resources. More than one-third of the Earth's land surface has been decertified to some degree by livestock grazing. In the rainforest, land is being clear-cut for grazing at a rate of 5 million acres a year, according to some estimates, but the American public remains in the dark. "While most Americans are concerned about rainforest destruction, few realize that cattle ranching stands as its salient cause," Lyman says. "An estimated 70 percent of the clearing of the Amazon is for cattle pasture."

Another issue is the water pollution caused by livestock waste dumped into streams and rivers. Les Inglis explains in his book, Diet for a Gentle World, "Water pollution from the livestock industry is two to three times greater than water pollution from all other industrial activities." According to Lyman, the largest feedlots produce as much waste as the largest American cities, with waste that can be several hundred times more concentrated than raw domestic sewage.

"Certainly these [environmental] problems wouldn't disappear overnight if the world suddenly became vegetarian," Lyman says. "But no other lifestyle change could produce as positive an impact on these profound threats to our collective survival as the adoption of a plant-based diet."

Hope for the future
All the different reasons for making a change in diet can seem overwhelming, but there is a brighter future. Lyman has seen the worst, yet still remains optimistic. "I personally believe we're winning," he says. "That's why we see so much money spent on advertising from the meat and dairy industries -- they're terrified that the word is getting out."

One of the keys to ending factory farming in the U.S. will be to empower the consumer with the education needed to make informed choices about their food. "If we're going to have a producer-consumer alliance, which uses small family farmers producing food without pesticides, herbicides, hormones and medication, it's not going to happen because of the government, or the farmers," Lyman says. "It will happen when the consumers use their money to buy the kind of product it's going to take to keep the farmers that are producing correctly, in business."

According to Lyman, the organic industry in the U.S. continues to grow at a rate of about 25 percent per year since 1992, and today there are 15,000 more farmer's markets than just one year ago. He is also quick to point out that it's easier to be vegetarian today than at any time in recent history, but he warns people to get educated about a vegetarian lifestyle before they decide to make a change in their diet. "I would say understand the issue, then attack it in a sensible fashion," he says. "Either eliminate all of the animal products, or take out the dairy and significantly cut down on the meat in your diet -- then ask yourself how you feel."

Since 1991, Lyman has traveled over 100,000 miles a year to educate consumers about the dangers and consequences of an animal-based diet. "The nice thing about it is, for change we need a crisis -- and we have a crisis," he says. "We will either implement the start of the solution for our children and grandchildren, or they will not have a future."

Howard Lyman will be speaking at "Lifestyles of the Healthy and Humane" Conference on Vegetarianism, on November 14 at Roosevelt University in Chicago, Illinois. For more information contact SPEAK at 773-925-1277.

Resources
The Humane Society of the United States, 301-258-8255.

EarthSave, 502-589-7676

Mad Cowboy: Plain Truth from the Cattle Rancher Who Won't Eat Meat, by Howard F. Lyman with Glen Merzer. Scribner: NY (1998).

Diet for a Gentle World: Eating with Conscience, by Les Inglis. Avery Publishing Group, Inc.: NY (1993).


Solution:


Alfalfa is the oldest known plant in the world and has been been used for centuries for healing. It's clinical name is Medicago Sativa! Where did the name medicine come from?

  WebMD Home

Nov. 15, 2002 -- A new study serves as good evidence that a western diet can more than double the risk of colon cancer. Researchers found that an increasingly western diet has led to a dramatic rise in colorectal cancer in Singapore. Rates of the cancer have doubled in the past three decades, largely because residents eat more red meat and fewer vegetables than in the past.

Singapore is one of Asia's most rapidly developing nations. And for many of the ethnic Chinese who make up 77% of the population, industrialization has brought both changes in diet and a more sedentary lifestyle. Colorectal cancer rates now approach those in developed countries and are among the highest in Asia.

To determine the influence of changing lifestyles on cancer rates, researchers from the National University of Singapore conducted interviews with 121 Chinese colorectal cancer patients and 222 healthy Chinese people. The findings appear in the Dec. 1 issue of the journal Cancer.

Researchers concluded that diet and a family history of colorectal cancer were the primary risk factors for the disease in the Chinese population. After accounting for all other risk factors, a high intake of red meat -- including beef and pork -- doubled the risk of colorectal cancer. No rise was seen for those reporting increased consumption of other meats or seafood. Eating vegetables was associated with a reduction in risk.

People who ate lots of red meat and few vegetables were more than 2.5 times more likely to get colon cancer. Eating lots of vegetables reduced the risk only slightly in those who also ate large amounts of red meat, but the risk was still almost double that of the healthy population. No other food groups -- including soy, legumes or fruit -- were found to have an impact on risk.

"Dietary intake of red meat in Western populations has been related to the risk of colorectal [cancer] in many, but not all, studies, and this appears to be independent of its contribution to total fat or protein content," lead researcher Adeline Seow, MD, and colleagues noted.

The National Cancer Institute's Arthur Schatzkin, PhD, who is an expert on the role of foods in cancer, tells WebMD that the evidence linking red meat consumption to colorectal cancer is strong but not conclusive. The consumption of processed meats has also been linked to colorectal cancer. Schatzkin is chief of the Nutritional Epidemiology Branch of the NCI's Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics.

"The majority of studies support the red meat link, but we have seen several widely accepted hypotheses become controversial," he says. "Until recently the link between dietary fiber and a reduced risk was accepted. Several well publicized studies challenged that idea, but they did not totally refute the hypothesis."

Colorectal cancer expert Charles Fuchs, of Boston's Dana Farber Cancer Institute, says that evidence suggests that eating red meat in moderation is safe. But how much is too much? Fuchs cites findings from a large U.S. study, which showed that women who ate beef, pork, or lamb five or more times a week had triple the risk of colon cancer.

"There are a lot of good reasons to be moderate in one's consumption of red meat, not the least of which is its link to heart disease," he tells WebMD. "Eating red meat more than five times a week is probably too much."


Beef Hormones Linked to Premature Onset of Puberty & Breast Cancer
Research links breast cancer, beef hormones

By Dennis Bueckert / The Canadian Press

Ottawa - Consumption of hormone-treated beef may be causing girls to reach puberty earlier than they used to and making them more susceptible to breast cancer, say researchers attending a world conference on breast
cancer.

It is "very likely" that hormone residues in North American beef is a factor in the early onset of puberty among girls in recent decades, said Carlos Sonnenschein of the Tufts University School of Medicine at Boston.

"There is no other reason to explain it," Sonnenschein said in an interview Friday.

Pediatricians say the onset of menstruation has steadily decreased in recent decades. The average age for a first period is now 12½, up from age 14 in 1900.

Early onset of puberty with its raging hormones translates into higher risk of breast cancer, said Sonnenschein.

"The length and amount of exposure to estrogens (a class of hormones) is one of the most significant risk factors in breast carcinogenesis.

"Unless you are exposed to estrogens you don't get breast cancer. The longer the exposure is, the higher the incidence. Therefore if you decrease the age of menarche (first menstruation) . . . you are at higher risk."

Hormones are used by cattle farmers in Canada and the United States to increase the weight of cattle prior to slaughter. They are currently the focus of a major trade dispute between North American and the European
Union.

Annie Sasco, of the International Agency for Research on Cancer at Lyons, France, said more study is needed but it makes sense that hormone-treated beef could affect the onset of puberty.

"Any exposure to a high level of hormones is associated with earlier onset of puberty. It needs to be studied more but it makes sense."

She said the risk of breast cancer associated with hormone residues in meat is not proven, and is probably small.

"We all have estrogens and we need estrogens," she told the mainly female audience. "They are needed for life, for being what we are. We cannot say, 'Ban estrogens.'

"We all have to try, through our diet and physical exercise, to keep our levels down. But there is a need to keep things in perspective . . . without getting into a complete
panic."

Even if the risk is small, she said it would be prudent to stop the use of hormones in the cattle industry there's no offsetting health benefit for consumers.

The European Union has banned the use of hormones for fear they pose a health risk, and has banned imports of hormone-treated  Canadian and U.S. meat.

The two North American countries have taken the dispute to the World Trade Organization and have won the right to retaliate by placing tariffs on European goods. Canada announced retaliatory tariffs on a range of goods this week.

The federal government maintains the hormones are safe, despite strong misgivings on the part of its own scientists at the Health Protection Branch.

Four scientists with concerns have been placed under orders not to discuss the issue in public.

The incidence of breast cancer has been rising steadily, most quickly in rich countries. In 1997, around the world, close to 400,000 women died of the disease.

The number of new cases reported annually approached 900,000 in 1997, up from 572,000 in 1980.

 

Mad Cowboy : Plain Truth from the Cattle Rancher Who Won't Eat Meat

Click to read what former cattle rancher Howard Lyman had to say on the Oprah Winfrey Show that led the beef industry to sue them.

 

Diet for a Gentle Wor

 


These are not range chickens


What are these cattle eating?


Just to get to this point!


Hormones increase milk production

 

Purlife Health & Research Company
Health with Alfalfa & Chlorophyll Chlorophyllin

1-888-465-5037 (TOLL FREE)
© 2005 All Rights Reserved