|
Benefits of
Chlorophyllin
|
|
 |
Fact
-
Chlorophyll(ins)
can help prevent Cancer
Science has known for years that
without chlorophyll, the 'green blood'
of plant / photosynthesis, life as we know it could not exist. Until
recently, most research involving plants
has been geared towards 'better plants'
for 'better meat'". For
years it was thought that the protein we needed could only come from
meat. This
website brings together the research that proves different,
such is the case in evolution.
In the 1960s poultry
farmers in the UK and trout farmers in the pacific northwest of the
United States began losing their stock to an unknown illness. The
culprit was identified as the fungus Aspergillus Flavus and a toxic
metabolite it produces called Aflatoxin B1, one of the most potent
human carcinogens. The trout were subsequently discovered to
be extremely sensitive to Aflatoxin B1 and an excellent model for
environmental carcinogenesis research.
In the mid-80s, Dr. Roderick Dashwood,
familiar with the anti-mutagenic abilities of chlorophylls in
bacterial assays, began to study the possible benefits of
chlorophyllins (a chlorophyll derivative commonly extracted from the
alfalfa plant) given to trout exposed to Aflatoxin B1. The results of
Dr. Dashwood and his colleagues were the first
scientific confirmation of the chemo-protective effect of
chlorophylls. Since then, research has continued using a multitude of
cancer causing substances. The results are the same ...
CHLOROPHYLLIN
HELPS PREVENT CANCER!
Unbelievably 'Chlorophyllin' is virtually
unheard of. Nutrition councils recommend 5-10 servings of fruits and
vegetables daily with particular emphasis on 'greens'. Unfortunately,
to obtain the benefits found in one dose of Chlorophyllin you would
have to consume massive amounts of fresh or frozen produce. In fact,
it takes approximately 400 lbs of raw material (alfalfa) to make 1 lb
of Chlorophyllin.
Now that
the facts are in, we hope that the medical profession will soon be
singing the praises of this natural, non-toxic wonder.
The information on this website will prove to be invaluable to you
and your loved ones. It is our hope, and our quest, that every home
in every country in every nation has access to this powerful
protector, simple inexpensive bottles of Liquid Chlorophyll (Sodium
Copper Chlorophyllin). If our voice is heard, most every known
disease will/can be prevented or cured.
Liquid Chlorophyllin,
a remarkable product derived from Medicago Sativa Leaf, has proven to
be one of the most powerful antioxidants AND studies have shown that
it can prevent cancer. Just 300 milligrams per day (3 tbsp) can
reduce your risk of cancer dramatically.
Chlorophyllin knocks
out dietary toxins (which account for 30-40% of all cancers)
fighting in at least two arenas. First, Chlorophyllin forms
irreversible complexes with some cancer causing substances that we
ingest before they enter the bloodstream (think of Velcro) and they
are safely eliminated from the body. Secondly, as an
antioxidant, Chlorophyllins neutralize free radicals within the body
that could otherwise cause cell mutations that can lead to cancer.
|
 |
 |
|
Heme Molecule in
Blood |
Chlorophyll Molecule |
Is ‘Chlorophyllin’
the same as chlorophyll? Not quite.
The chlorophyll molecule in its natural state contains a magnesium
center and is not water-soluble. Scientists are unsure just how
much, if any, enters the bloodstream. Chlorophyllin molecules
on the other hand, are able to travel throughout the body as the
magnesium center has been replaced with copper. Copper, like iron, is
an oxygen transporter. In fact, the chlorophyllin molecule is almost
identical to the heme molecule in our blood.
Oxygenate yourself
with Oxygenz Liquid Chlorophyllin! It is so simple to
incorporate our Oxygenz Liquid Chlorophyllins into your daily
routine. Like our Phytogenz Powder, it can be added to your
favorite beverage and enjoyed any time of day. Detoxify,
improve circulation and regularity, eliminate body odor, help treat
anemia, improve hemoglobin levels (especially during chemotherapy).
In human breast cell
studies, chlorophyllin was one of the most effective compounds
protecting against DNA adduct formation. Chlorophyllin inhibited
adduct formation 65% at 30 micromolar concentrations, and it was also
a very effective inhibitor at 15 micromoles, a level obtainable in
vivo in the tissues of humans (Smith et al. 2001).
In vitro studies with
chlorophyllin show it to be an inhibitor of the cytochrome P-450
liver enzymes (Tachino et al. 1994). All in vivo [whole animal]
studies where cytochrome P-450 enzyme activity is reduced resulted in
lower cancer rates and longer lifespan (Guengerich et al. 1991). In
Stage 2 liver detoxification, enzymes called glutathione transferases
cause glutathione to react with the carcinogens formed from
cytochrome P-450 activity to produce harmless additional products,
but this process is not very efficient (Finch et al. 1997).
Chlorophyllin, however, makes this conversion more efficient by
lowering cytochrome P-450 enzyme activity in the first place and by
reacting with carcinogens to produce harmless complexes, just as the
glutathione transferases do. Thus, chlorophyllin is not an inducer of
glutathione transferases but mimics glutathione transferase activity.
Effect of cancer
chemopreventive agents on microsome-mediated DNA adduction of the
breast carcinogen dibenzo[a,l]pyrene.
Smith WA, Arif JM, Gupta RC.
Graduate Center for Toxicology, University of Kentucky Medical
Center, Lexington 40536-0305, USA.
Due to the large and expanding number of potential cancer
chemopreventive agents, there is an increasing need for short term
tests to study the efficacy and mechanisms of these agents. In this
study, we have employed a microsome-mediated test system to study the
effect of several suspected chemopreventive agents on the DNA adduct
formation capacity of the potent mammary carcinogen,
dibenzo[a,l]pyrene (DBP). Bioactivation of DBP by Aroclor
1254-induced rat liver microsomes in the presence of calf thymus DNA
(300 microg/ml) resulted in the formation of one major and six other
prominent DNA adducts (324 adducts/10(7) nucleotides). These adducts
were previously determined to be deoxyadenosine (dA) and deoxyanosine
(dG)-derivatives of both anti- and syn-DBP-11,12-diol-13,14-epoxides
(DBPDE). Intervention with ellagic acid, chlorophyllin, benzyl
isocyanate (BIC), oltipraz or genistein (150 microM) strongly
diminished DBP-DNA adduction by > or = 75%. Linoleic acid, curcumin
and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) also significantly inhibited DBP
DNA adduction (26-46%) while N-acetylcysteine (NAC) had no effect.
Moreover, nonenzymatic studies with anti- and syn-DBPDE isomers
revealed that chlorophyllin,
ellagic acid, BIC and BHT may be inhibiting DBP-DNA adduction
in an enzymatic-independent manner since these agents diminished
DBPDE-DNA adduction by 30-75%. Genistein, oltipraz and curcumin did
not diminish DBPDE-DNA adduction and therefore most likely require
the presence of the microsomal subcellular fraction to inhibit DBP-DNA
adduction.
Early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer (review).
Dashwood RH.
The Linus Pauling Institute, Department of Environmental and
Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
97331-6512, USA.
Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and
the two most important considerations for avoidance of this disease
are early detection and prevention. If metastasis has occurred to
distant sites, such as the liver and lung, the 5-year survival rate
for colorectal cancer is below 10%, but this increases to greater
than 90% when the cancer is found early. Early detection can be
facilitated by use of the digital rectal exam, fecal occult blood
test, sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy, but these methods might be
supplemented in the future by other screening assays using
intermediate biomarkers. One interesting biomarker, the aberrant
crypt focus (ACF), has been observed in resected human colons, and is
the earliest detectable morphological change in the colons of
experimental animals treated with carcinogens such as the cooked meat
heterocyclic amines. The ACF can also be used as an end-point to
screen for potential inhibitors of colorectal cancer; using this
approach, we identified conjugated linoleic acids, indole-3-carbinol,
chlorophyllin, and tea
polyphenols as promising inhibitors in the colon. These
compounds can be added to a growing list of natural and synthetic
agents that might be effective against colorectal cancer, including
selenium, calcium, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents.
However, results from human clinical trials with several of these
compounds have highlighted the need for detailed mechanism data
before recommendations can be made for wide-scale use in humans. In
the meantime, the best approach to reducing the risk of colorectal
cancer would be to increase the dietary intake of fruits, vegetables
and cereals, while reducing the overall intake of fat, particularly
from animal sources.
Inhibition of radiation-induced
DNA damage in plasmid pBR322 by chlorophyllin and possible
mechanism(s) of action>
Kumar SS, Chaubey RC,
Devasagayam TP, Priyadarsini KI, Chauhan PS.
Cell Biology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085,
India.
Naturally occurring compounds capable of protecting DNA against
ionizing radiation and chemical mutagens have considerable potential
for prevention of mutation-based health impairment including cancer
and other degenerative diseases.
Chlorophyllin (CHL), a
water-soluble derivative of chlorophyll, has been examined for
its ability to protect DNA against radiation induced strand breaks
using an in vitro plasmid DNA system. Gamma-radiation, up to a dose
of 6 Gy (dose rate 1.25 Gy/min), induced a dose-dependent increase in
single-strand breaks (ssbs) in plasmid pBR322 DNA. CHL per se did not
induce, but inhibited radiation-induced ssbs in a
concentration-dependent manner; 500 microM giving about 90%
protection. The protection afforded by CHL was comparatively less
than that of trolox, a water-soluble analogue of alpha-tocopherol. To
elucidate the underlying mechanism(s), reaction of CHL with the
radiation-derived hydroxyl radical (.OH) and deoxyribose peroxyl
radical (ROO.) was studied by pulse radiolysis. CHL exhibited a rate
constant of 6.1+/-0.4x109 M-1 s-1 with.OH and 5.0+/-1.3x107 M-1 s-1
with ROO. To our knowledge,
this is the first report providing direct evidence of free
radical-scavenging properties of CHL. The results showed that
CHL, effectively protects plasmid DNA against ionizing radiation, in
an in vitro system independent of DNA repair or other cellular
defense mechanisms. The
ability of CHL to scavenge. OH and ROO., may contribute to its
protective effects against radiation induced DNA damage in the pBR322
system.
Chemoprevention studies of
heterocyclic amine-induced colon carcinogenesis.
Xu M, Dashwood RH.
The Linus Pauling Institute, and Department of Environmental and
Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331-6512,
USA.
The cooking of meat and fish produces heterocyclic amine mutagens,
including 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5b]pyridine (PhIP) and
2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ). Chronic administration
of PhIP or IQ to the F344 rat induces tumors at several sites,
including adenocarcinomas of the colon, and short-term treatment
leads to the formation of colonic aberrant crypt foci (ACF). We have
used these end-points to identify potential chemopreventive agents
that might be effective against heterocyclic amine colon carcinogens.
Typically, IQ or PhIP were administered to groups of 10-15 rats by
oral gavage on alternating days in weeks 3 and 4, and ACF were scored
after 8, 12, or 16 weeks or tumors were detected at 52 weeks. To
distinguish between 'blocking' and 'suppressing' agents, potential
inhibitors were administered during the initiation or post-initiation
phases, respectively, and subsequent studies focused on the
inhibitory mechanisms. Among
the most effective inhibitors identified to date, and their major
mechanisms, were the following: chlorophyllin (molecular
complex formation); indole-3-carbinol (inhibition and induction of
cytochromes P450 and phase II enzymes); green and black tea catechins
(induction of UDP-glucuronosyl transferase, inhibition of
NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase, scavenging of reactive
intermediates); and conjugated linoleic acids (inhibition of
cytochrome P450 and prostaglandin H synthase.
Porphyrins as possible
preventers of heterocyclic amine carcinogenesis.
Hayatsu H, Sugiyama C, Arimoto-Kobayashi
S, Negishi T.
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Tsushima,
Japan. hayatsu@ph2ews1.okayama-u.ac.jp
Our studies have shown that hemin and
chlorophyllin can directly
interact with heterocyclic amines (HAs) and prevent their mutagenic
actions. Hemin and chlorophyllin can trap HAs efficiently,
probably by forming face-to-face complexes with them. The trapping
was most clearly demonstrated by use of solid-supported porphyrins,
hemin-agarose and chlorophyllin-chitosan. Furthermore, spectroscopic
measurements have suggested that there are interactions in solution
between the porphyrins and the HAs. A number of in vivo data have
been accumulated by efforts from many laboratories for the
anticarcinogenic and antigenotoxic properties of porphyrins,
particularly chlorophyllin, against HAs.
Inhibition of dibenzo[a,l]pyrene-induced multi-organ
carcinogenesis by dietary chlorophyllin in rainbow trout.
Reddy AP, Harttig U, Barth MC, Baird WM, Schimerlik M, Hendricks
JD, Bailey GS.
Department of Environmental Toxicology, Oregon State University,
Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Cancer chemoprevention by dietary chlorophyllin (CHL) was investigated
in a rainbow trout multi-organ tumor model. In study 1, duplicate
groups of 130 juvenile trout were treated for 2 weeks with control
diet, 500 p.p.m. dibenzo[a,l]pyrene (DB[a,l]P) or 500 p.p.m. DB[a,l]P
+ 2052 p.p.m. CHL, then returned to control diet. DB[a,l]P alone
proved somewhat toxic but induced high tumor incidences in liver
(61%), stomach (91%) and swimbladder (53%) 11 months after initiation.
CHL co-feeding abrogated DB[a,l]P acute toxicity and reduced tumor
incidences to 18% in liver, 34% in stomach and 3% in swimbladder (P
</= 0.01). A second tumor and DNA adduct study using a non-toxic
initiation protocol (200 p.p.m. DB[a,l]P +/- 4000 p.p.m. CHL for 4
weeks) confirmed these results. Potential CHL inhibitory mechanisms
were investigated. Dietary CHL inhibited hepatic DB[a, l]P-DNA adducts
in the two tumor studies by 89 and 76%, respectively. CHL was shown to
complex strongly with DB[a,l]P (K(d1,2) = 1.59 +/- 0.01 &mgr;M,
stoichiometry 2CHL:DB[a,l]P) and strongly inhibited DB[a,l]P
mutagenesis in the Salmonella assay. Significant inhibition occurred
at CHL concentrations substantially less than stoichiometric with
DB[a,l]P and thus not reflecting simple DB[a,l]P sequestration via
complexation. These initial findings suggest that CHL chemoprevention
reflects complexation that might limit DB[a,l]P uptake in vivo,
antimutagenic mechanisms such as catalytic degradation of the
proximate electrophile in target cells, or both.
These results demonstrate that
dietary CHL is a reproducibly effective chemopreventive agent for
DB[a,l]P multi-organ tumorigenesis in trout and suggest that reduced
DB[a,l]P-DNA adducts may be predictive biomarkers of CHL reduction of
DB[a,l]P-initiated hepatic tumors.
Chlorophyllin as
an effective antioxidant against membrane damage in vitro and ex
vivo.
Kamat JP, Boloor KK, Devasagayam TP.
Cell Biology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, 400 085, Mumbai,
India.
Chlorophyllin (CHL), the sodium-copper salt and the water-soluble
analogue of the ubiquitous green pigment chlorophyll, has been
attributed to have several beneficial properties. Its antioxidant
ability, however, has not been examined in detail. Using rat liver
mitochondria as model system and various sources for the generation of
reactive oxygen species (ROS) we have examined the membrane-protective
properties of CHL both under in vitro and ex vivo conditions.
Oxidative damage to proteins was assessed as inactivation of the
enzymes, cytochrome c oxidase and succinic dehydrogenase besides
formation of protein carbonyls. Damage to membrane lipids was measured
by formation of lipid hydroperoxides and thiobarbituric acid reactive
substances. The effect of this compound on the antioxidant defense
system was studied by estimating the level of glutathione and
superoxide dismutase. ROS were generated by gamma-radiation,
photosensitization, ascorbate-Fe(2+), NADPH-ADP-Fe(3+) and the peroxyl
radical generating agent, azobis-amidopropane hydrochloride. Our
results show that CHL is highly effective in protecting mitochondria,
even at a low concentration of 10 microM. The antioxidant ability, at
equimolar concentration, was more than that observed with ascorbic
acid, glutathione, mannitol and tert-butanol. When CHL was fed to mice
at a dose of 1% in drinking water, there was a significant reduction
in the potential for oxidative damage in cell suspensions from liver,
brain and testis. To examine the possible mechanisms responsible for
the observed antioxidant ability we have studied the reaction of CHL
with the potent ROS in the form of hydroxyl radical and singlet
oxygen. The compound shows a fairly high rate constant with singlet
oxygen, in the order of 1.3x10(8) M(-1) s(-1).
In conclusion, our studies
showed that CHL (Chlorophyllin) is a highly effective antioxidant,
capable of protecting mitochondria against oxidative damage induced by
various ROS.
Worldwide, approximately 473,000 new
cases of liver cancer are diagnosed annually, with 80% occurring in
the developing world. Two risk factors work synergistically to
greatly increase the risk of liver cancer: chronic infection with
hepatitis B virus (HBV), which affects approximately 350 million
individuals, and chronic exposure to aflatoxins, especially aflatoxin
B1, highly potent liver toxicants produced by molds that contaminate
dietary staples. Both risk factors are especially prevalent in the
developing world, but one step toward reducing this threat may be
chemoprevention, the use of drugs or dietary supplements to derail
aflatoxin exposure effects.
In a study published in the 4 December 2001 issue of Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences, scientists found that chlorophyllin,
an artificially produced water-soluble salt of the plant pigment
chlorophyll, shows promise as such a chemopreventive agent.
Thomas Kensler, a professor of
environmental health sciences at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School
of Public Health in Baltimore, Maryland, directed the chlorophyllin
trial. He says a two-pronged approach is needed to combat the
problem: HBV vaccination--the most important part--for the viral
component, and chemoprevention for the aflatoxin component. "Since
there is this multiplicative interaction between the chemical and the
virus, if either one can be knocked down, there can be a pretty
dramatic impact, at least in theory, on cancer burden," he says.
As a step toward proving that theory
and to test the efficacy of chlorphyllin as a chemopreventive agent,
researchers looked to the Chinese city of Qidong, where liver cancer
is the leading cause of cancer death and accounts for up to 10% of
all adult deaths in some rural townships. The researchers recruited
180 individuals from villages near Qidong, all of whom had
demonstrable aflatoxin exposure but were healthy. They were randomly
assigned to take either a placebo or a 100 mg dose of chlorophyllin
three times daily, 20 minutes before each meal, for 16 weeks.
The key finding came from urine samples
collected in week 12. These samples revealed a significant decrease
in urinary aflatoxin-N7-guanine, a biomarker of aflatoxin-induced DNA
damage, in the treated group compared to the placebo group. The level
of this biomarker allows researchers to assess chemoprevention
efficacy. In the Qidong
trial, participants who received chlorophyllin had approximately half
as much urinary aflatoxin-N7-guanine as those in the placebo group.
A study published by University of Washington researcher Lawrence A.
Loeb in the 15 April 2001
issue of Cancer
Research suggests
that reducing aflatoxin-induced DNA damage by this margin might delay
liver cancer development for decades.
Chlorophyllin's mechanism of action is
still unclear, but there is some indication that it attaches to the
aflatoxin, thereby impeding absorption and shuttling the toxin
through the digestive tract. Kensler says other mechanisms may be
involved as well. What makes chlorophyllin especially attractive is
that it's inexpensive and safe. There were no side effects reported
by the study group other than darker-than-normal stool. The sole
drawback appears to be the number of times the treatment must be
taken each day.
According to Kensler, the next question
is whether chlorophyllin can reduce the incidence of liver cancer
itself. "We're taking tentative steps to moving in that direction,
but that's a major undertaking so we want to make sure we know
exactly how to [design and conduct the study] to [get] the best
likely outcome," he says.
"Chlorophyllin is certainly a
promising chemopreventive compound for aflatoxin exposure reduction,
given the dramatic effects seen on DNA damage levels observed in the
Chinese study," say Paul Turner and Christopher Wild, molecular
epidemiologists at the University of Leeds School of Medicine in
Great Britain, whose own research has focused on the HBV-aflatoxin
relationship and alternative aflatoxin intervention approaches in
West Africa.
Although HBV vaccination will have the
greatest influence on reducing liver cancer incidence, Turner and
Wild emphasize that addressing the problem of aflatoxin exposure is
also important. Aflatoxin exposure itself probably contributes to the
incidence of liver cancer independently of HBV infection, they say,
and vaccination will provide no protection for the millions who
already carry the virus. In addition, say the researchers, "despite
World Health Organization recommendations, economic and logistic
problems result in only one percent of children in Africa currently
having access to HBV vaccination. For these groups of people,
aflatoxin exposure intervention could significantly reduce their
liver cancer risk."
Use of aflatoxin adducts as
intermediate endpoints to assess the efficacy of chemopreventive
interventions in animals and man.
Kensler TW, Groopman JD, Roebuck BD.
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of
Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. tkensler@jhsph.edu
Clinical cancer prevention studies that use disease as an endpoint are
of necessity, large, lengthy, and extremely costly. Development of the
field of cancer chemoprevention is being accelerated by the
application of intermediate markers to preclinical and clinical
studies. Sensitive and specific analytic methods have been developed
for detecting and quantifying levels of covalent adducts of aflatoxins
with cellular DNA and blood proteins at ambient levels of exposure.
Such biomarkers can be applied to the preselection of exposed
individuals for study cohorts, thereby reducing study size
requirements. Levels of these aflatoxin-DNA and albumin adducts can be
modulated by chemopreventive agents such as oltipraz and
chlorophyllin in
experimental models. Overall, a good concordance is seen between
diminution of biomarkers and reductions in tumor incidence and/or
multiplicity in these settings. Thus, these markers can also be used
to rapidly assess the efficacy of preventive interventions. However,
the successful application of these biomarkers to clinical prevention
trials will be dependent upon prior determination of the associative
or causal role of the marker to the carcinogenic process,
establishment of the relationship between dose and response, and
appreciation of the kinetics of adduct formation and removal. The
general approach that has been utilized for the development,
validation and application of aflatoxin-DNA and protein adduct
biomarkers to cancer chemoprevention trials is summarized. Copyright
1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Chlorophylls:
Can These Green Food Pigments
Prevent Some Cancers?
George S. Bailey, Ph.D.
Distinguished Professor of Food Toxicology
OSU/LPI Affiliate Investigator
Chlorophyll, the
natural plant pigment that lends its color to grass, leaves, and many
of the vegetables we eat, may play an important role in prevention of
certain cancers. Researchers in the early 1980s discovered that
chlorophylls and related chemicals can inhibit the ability of certain
DNA-damaging chemicals to cause mutations in bacteria. How might this
kind of "anti-mutagenic" activity be important in cancer prevention?
Molecular geneticists now know that most if not all human cancers
carry mutations in one or more genes that control the rates at which
individual cells divide, differentiate, or die. According to current
thinking, various combinations of mutations that upset this delicate
balance to favor uncontrolled cell growth can then enable this
irreversibly damaged cell to form a primary cancer in the lung,
liver, blood, bone, skin, or another body organ. Therefore, it seems
at least theoretically possible that the anti-mutagenic power of the
chlorophylls might allow them to inhibit or reduce the formation of
cancers in humans. Recent progress in our laboratory and elsewhere
has brought this promise closer to realization.
|
People in certain
parts of Africa, China, and other developing countries with
similarly warm, damp climates have the highest rates of liver
cancer in the world. The two major risk factors are chronic
hepatitis B viral infection, and exposure to aflatoxin B1 (AFB1)
in the food supply. People exposed to both factors are at
extremely high risk for liver cancer. Peanuts, corn, rice, and
other grains and nuts stored under warm damp conditions can be
infected with the mold Aspergillus flavus, which produces
AFB1 as a secondary metabolite. AFB1 is one of the most potent
cancer-causing chemicals, or carcinogens, ever discovered.
Interestingly, AFB1 came to be recognized as a potential human
liver carcinogen only after it was identified as the cause of
outbreaks of liver cancer in rainbow trout hatcheries in the
Pacific Northwest in the 1960s.
Much of that pioneering work was carried out at
Oregon State University by Professor Russel Sinnhuber who
immediately recognized the promise of the rainbow trout as a
model of exquisite sensitivity for the study of liver cancer.
Postdoctoral fellows and graduate students in my laboratory have
been using this model for the past 12 years in a search for means
to reduce AFB1-based liver cancer risk.
Dr. Roderick Dashwood, a postdoctoral associate
who came to my lab in 1986, became interested in chlorophylls.
Although their anti-mutagenic activity in bacterial assays was
then well known, no one knew if chlorophylls could have a
protective effect in animals. Rod discovered that rainbow trout
fed AFB1 together with chlorophyllin, a simple water-soluble
chlorophyll derivative, had greatly reduced damage to their liver
DNA compared to trout receiving AFB1 alone. Would this reduce
liver cancer development? That question was answered by a Ph.D.
student, Vibeke Breinholt, who showed that even very modest
dietary levels of chlorophyllin, roughly equivalent to the
chlorophyll in one small helping of spinach, strongly reduced
liver cancer in trout co-fed AFB1. Vibeke's results also showed
clearly that this reduction could be directly attributed to
reduced AFB1-DNA damage in the liver. These very exciting
findings were the first ever to reveal a true cancer-protective
effect by chlorophylls.
Several important questions now remained before
these findings might be taken to human trials: Was the effect
unique to trout or would chlorophyllin inhibit cancer in other
animals? How did the cancer inhibition come about and would this
mechanism likely apply to AFB1-exposed humans? Could
chlorophyllin inhibit cancers other than liver or caused by
carcinogens other than AFB1 -- that is, might it have a
potentially broader applicability? Would native chlorophylls in
the plants we eat be as effective as the chlorophyllin
derivative? The answers to most of these questions are now known.
Rod Dashwood, presently at University of Hawaii, found that
chlorophyllin in the drinking water could strongly reduce colon
cancer development in rats exposed to heterocyclic amines, which
are potent carcinogens isolated from meats broiled at high
temperature. Others found similar protection against skin tumors
in mice painted with polyaromatic hydrocarbons, and we have shown
protection against stomach and liver cancer in trout treated with
a carcinogenic hydrocarbon found in tobacco smoke. Subsequent
work by Vibeke, Michael Schimerlik, and Tetsu Hayashi showed that
chlorophyllin associated tightly with AFB1, even in the acidic
environment of the stomach and at the temperature of the human
body, which most likely explained the ability of chlorophyllin to
greatly reduce bioavailability or uptake of AFB1 from the diet.
John Groopman and Tom Kensler two colleagues at Johns Hopkins
University, found that dietary chlorophyllin was as effective at
preventing AFB1-DNA damage in the liver of rats as it was in
trout. Such a simple and safe protective mechanism was almost
sure to apply to humans!
Based on these findings and the known safety of
chlorophyllin, the National Institute of Environmental Health
Sciences recently funded a research grant for Drs. Kensler,
Groopman, and me to conduct a chlorophyllin intervention trial in
a region of China where people are unavoidably exposed to high
levels of AFB1 in their diet. In August I ventured to the little
town of Daxin where Tom and I, with the help of local physicians
from the Qidong Liver Cancer Institute, initiated the trial.
After screening 500 volunteers, over 200 people
were identified with high levels of chronic AFB1 exposure. Of
these, 90 people will receive a green sugar pill and 90 will
receive a green chlorophyllin tablet with each meal for four
months. (The samples are all coded and nobody knows who gets what
until the code is revealed at the very end). Blood and urine
samples are being collected every second week. By analysis of
these samples we hope to tell if chlorophyllin alters AFB1 uptake
and liver DNA damage in people as it does in trout and rats. The
experiment can detect a reduction of 20% or greater, and, of
course, this is what we hope to see. On a personal note, those of
us trained in the basic sciences rarely have an opportunity to
see our work applied directly to the reduction of human disease
and misery. It would be rewarding indeed to see the trout model
applied full circle from the discovery of a major form of human
cancer risk, to the discovery of a simple means for its
prevention. By this time next year I hope to be able to tell you
how this turns out.
The Outcome Follows
A study conducted by researchers at the Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health shows that taking
chlorophyllin greatly reduces the levels of aflatoxin-DNA damage
byproducts in the body, which are indicators of exposure to
carcinogenic aflatoxins and increased risk of liver cancer.
Chlorophyllin is a derivative of chlorophyll and is used as an
over-the-counter diet supplement and as a food colorant. The
results appear in the November 27, 2001 edition of Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences.
“Our study shows that taking
chlorophyllin three times a day reduced the amounts of aflatoxin-DNA
damage by 55 percent, compared with taking a placebo,” says
Thomas Kensler, PhD, professor of environmental health sciences
at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. “Taking
chlorophyllin or eating green vegetables, like spinach, that are
rich in chlorophyll may be a practical way of reducing the risk
of liver cancer and other cancers caused by environmental
triggers,” explains Dr. Kensler.
Dr. Kensler and his colleagues
conducted a double-blind study among residents of Qidong, China.
The people of the region have an extraordinarily high rate of
liver cancer, which is due in part from routinely eating foods
contaminated with carcinogenic aflatoxins. The aflatoxin is
produced by molds found in foods like corn, peanuts, soy sauce,
and fermented soybeans.
For the study, researchers
recruited 180 healthy adults. Half of the group was given 100 mg
tablets of chlorophyllin to take three times a day with meals for
four months. The other half was given a placebo. Urine and blood
samples were taken over four months to determine the effects of
chlorophyllin on excretion of aflatoxin-DNA damage products.
According to the study’s results,
the people who took chlorophyllin showed a 55 percent reduction
in aflatoxin-DNA damage, compared to the placebo group.
“Studies conducted by our
co-author, George Bailey of Oregon State University, have
suggested that chlorophyllin acts as an ‘interceptor molecule’ to
block the absorption of aflatoxins and carcinogens in the diet,”
explains John Groopman, PhD, professor and chairman of the
Department of Environmental Health Sciences at the Johns Hopkins
Bloomberg School of Public Health. “Our study shows that
chlorophyllin can effectively reduce aflatoxin levels, which
should reduce the risk of liver cancer. Since chlorophyllin is
found in many foods or can be easily added to the diet, it could
be a safe and effective prevention method. The study adds to the
evidence that green vegetables contain effective anticarcinogens,”
adds Dr. Groopman.
Follow up studies are planned to
determine whether this early protective action of chlorophyllin
extends to either delay the onset or reduce the incidence of
liver cancer.
Patricia Egner, Jin-Bing Wang,
Yuan-Rong Zhu, Bao-Chu Zhang, Geng-Sun Qian, Shuang-Yuan Kuang,
Stephen J. Gange, Lisa P. Jacobson, Kathy J. Helzlsouer, George
S. Bailey, John D. Groopman, and Thomas W. Kensler assisted in
the research and writing of the article “Chlorophyllin
intervention reduces aflatoxin-DNA adducts in individuals at high
risk for liver cancer.”
The study was funded by grants from
the U.S. Public Health Service, National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences.
Note: This story
has been adapted from a news release issued for journalists and
other members of the public. If you wish to quote any part of
this story, please credit Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg
School Of Public Health as the original source.
|
|